EconStor >
World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division, Geneva >
WTO Staff Working Papers, Economic Research and Statistics Division, WTO >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57586
  
Title:Trade in healthcare and health insurance services: The GATS as a supporting actor (?) PDF Logo
Authors:Adlung, Rudolf
Issue Date:2009
Series/Report no.:WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2009-15
Abstract:The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is broader in policy coverage than conventional trade agreements for goods and, at the same time, offers governments more flexibility, in various dimensions, to tailor their obligations to sector- or country-specific needs. An overview of existing commitments on healthcare and health insurance services shows that WTO Members have made abundant use of these possibilities. While most participants elected not to undertake bindings on healthcare services at the end of the Uruguay Round, nor to make offers in the ongoing negotiations, insurance services have been among the most frequently committed sectors. If there is a common denominator, regardless of the Members concerned (except for recently acceded countries), it is the existence of a lot of 'water' between existing commitments and more open conditions of actual access in many sectors. This may also explain, in part, why there have been very few trade disputes under the GATS to date - far fewer than under the GATT in merchandise trade. Also, governments appear to be generally hesitant in politically and socially sensitive areas to take action in the WTO. There are indications, however, that the same 'players' have acted differently in other policy contexts. For example, it appears that under recent preferential trade agreements (PTAs) the European Communities has been even more cautious in committing on hospital services and protecting scope for (discriminatory) subsidies than under the GATS. Yet, this is not necessarily true for the obligations assumed by many countries, including individual EC Member States, under bilateral investment treaties (BITs). These treaties overlap with the GATS, as far as commercial presence is concerned, and may be used by aggrieved investors to challenge policy restrictions in host countries. However, though frequently invoked, BITs do not meet the same standards, in terms of transparency, open (consensual) rulemaking and legal certainty, as commitments under the GATS.
Subjects:GATS
trade in services
international investment
public health
JEL:F13
F53
F59
I18
K33
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:WTO Staff Working Papers, Economic Research and Statistics Division, WTO

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
639706762.pdf163.96 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57586

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.