EconStor >
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin >
DIW-Diskussionspapiere >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57255
  
Title:The good governance indicators of the millennium challenge account: How many dimensions are really being measured? PDF Logo
Authors:Knoll, Martin
Zloczysti, Petra
Issue Date:2011
Series/Report no.:Discussion papers, German Institute for Economic Research 1148
Abstract:This paper assesses the validity of the perception-based governance indicators used by the US Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) for aid allocation decisions. By conducting Explanatory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of data from 1996 to 2009, we find that although the MCA purports to measure seven distinct dimensions of governance, only two discrete underlying dimensions, the perceived 'participatory dimension of governance' and the perceived 'overall quality of governance,' can be identified. Our results also show that some of the doubts that have been raised concerning the validity of perception-based governance indicators are less warranted when the indicators are applied exclusively to developing countries.
Subjects:Aid Allocation
Governance Indicators
Factor Analysis
MCA
United States
JEL:C38
F35
O10
O51
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:DIW-Diskussionspapiere
Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des DIW

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
689504810.pdf512.63 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57255

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.