EconStor >
Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson (NY) >
Levy Economics Institute of Bard College >
Working Papers, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57084
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFullwiler, Scotten_US
dc.contributor.authorRandall Wray, L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-21en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-12T14:26:31Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-12T14:26:31Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/57084-
dc.description.abstractBeyond its original mission to 'furnish an elastic currency' as lender of last resort and manager of the payments system, the Federal Reserve has always been responsible (along with the Treasury) for regulating and supervising member banks. After World War II, Congress directed the Fed to pursue a dual mandate, long interpreted to mean full employment with reasonable price stability. The Fed has been left to decide how to achieve these objectives, and it has over time come to view price stability as the more important of the two. In our view, the Fed’s focus on inflation fighting diverted ist attention from its responsibility to regulate and supervise the financial sector, and ist mandate to keep unemployment low. Its shift of priorities contributed to creation of the conditions that led to this crisis. Now in its third phase of responding to the crisis and the accompanying deep recession - so-called 'quantitative easing 2', or “QE2” - the Fed is currently in the process of purchasing $600 billion in Treasuries. Like its predecessor, QE1, QE2 is unlikely to seriously impact either of the Fed’s dual objectives, however, for the following reasons: (1) additional bank reserves do not enable greater bank lending; (2) the interest rate effects are likely to be small at best given the Fed’s tactical approach to QE2, while the private sector is attempting to deleverage at any rate, not borrow more; (3) purchases of Treasuries are simply an asset swap that reduce the maturity and liquidity of private sector assets but do not raise incomes of the private sector; and (4) given the reduced maturity of private sector Treasury portfolios, reduced net interest income could actually be mildly deflationary. The most fundamental shortcoming of QE - or, in fact, of using monetary policy in general to combat the recession - is that it only 'works' if it somehow induces the private sector to spend more out of current income. A much more direct approach, particularly given much-needed deleveraging by the private sector, is to target growth in after tax incomes and job creation through appropriate and sufficiently large fiscal actions. Unfortunately, stimulus efforts to date have not met these criteria, and so have mostly kept the recession from being far worse rather than enabling a significant economic recovery. Finally, while there is identical risk to the federal government whether a bailout, a loan, or an asset purchase is undertaken by the Fed or the Treasury, there have been enormous, fundamental differences in democratic accountability for the two institutions when such actions have been taken since the crisis began. Public debates surrounding the wisdom of bailouts for the auto industry, or even continuing to provide benefits to the unemployed, never took place when it came to the Fed committing trillions of dollars to the financial system - even though, again, the federal government is 'on the hook' in every instance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLevy Economics Inst. Annandale-on-Hudson, NYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper, Levy Economics Institute 645en_US
dc.subject.jelE42en_US
dc.subject.jelE43en_US
dc.subject.jelE62en_US
dc.subject.jelE63en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordquantitative easingen_US
dc.subject.keywordmonetary policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordfiscal policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordmacroeconomic stabilizationen_US
dc.subject.keywordinterest ratesen_US
dc.subject.keywordcentral bank operationsen_US
dc.titleQuantitative easing and proposals for reform of monetary policy operationsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn642331413en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
642331413.pdf482.22 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.