EconStor >
Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Jena >
Jena Economic Research Papers, MPI für Ökonomik >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56921
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFreytag, Andreasen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeckelman, Jac C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-06en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-11T09:31:45Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-11T09:31:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/56921-
dc.description.abstractForeign aid, especially official development assistance (ODA), has received increasing criticism in past decades. In particular, it has been put into question if and to what extent aid can help foster the aims for which it has been paid. In most cases, it seems that there is no discernable effect or even a negative effect of ODA on economic development. One reason for aid ineffectiveness may be seen in a lack of good governance on the side of the recipients. It has been argued that aid should concentrate more on creating better institutions. In the past 20 years, democracy promotion has become a pillar of USAID's mission and the funding for democracy and governance has steadily increased. The transition economies in particular have received special attention upon the fall of the Soviet Union. We assess the success of this aid by testing whether US aid is enhancing democracy in 26 transition countries. Using Freedom House Nations in Transit data, we find that in simple linear panel regressions aid has generally not been a significant factor in a country's overall democracy score. However, aid has significantly contributed to certain components of the democracy score, namely civil society, electoral process, judicial framework, and media independence. In addition, the impact of aid is found to depend on the number of years of past central planning. Countries having a history of less than 50 years of central planning had a significantly negative association to aid, whereas countries with more than 65 years of central planning benefited from greater aid.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv. [u.a.] Jenaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJena economic research papers 2011,017en_US
dc.subject.jelO2en_US
dc.subject.jelP2en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordODAen_US
dc.subject.keywordtransition economiesen_US
dc.subject.keyworddemocracyen_US
dc.subject.stwEntwicklungshilfeen_US
dc.subject.stwAmerikanischen_US
dc.subject.stwDemokratisierungen_US
dc.subject.stwÜbergangswirtschaften_US
dc.subject.stwOsteuropaen_US
dc.titleHas assistance from USAID been successful in promoting and sustaining democracy? Evidence from the transition economies of Eastern Europe and Eurasiaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn657432504en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Jena Economic Research Papers, MPI für Ökonomik

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
657432504.pdf391.97 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.