|
EconStor >
Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Jena >
Jena Economic Research Papers, MPI für Ökonomik >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56910
|
| | |
| Title: | | Bargaining and negotiations: What should experimentalists explore more thoroughly?  |
| Authors: | | Güth, Werner |
| Issue Date: | | 2011 |
| Series/Report no.: | | Jena economic research papers 2011,012 |
| Abstract: | | A long time ago most economists would have limited themselves to stating that agreements should be individually rational and efficient and that selecting a specific agreement from that set depends on bargaining and negotiation power whatever that may be. Nowadays hardly any economist will argue that way. The change has been brought about by the strategic approach to bargaining and cooperation and the parallel experimental studies of bargaining and negotiation. When arguing what should be explored more thoroughly, we will point out directions where previous efforts may have been misdirected, where importing new methods may be helpful or even needed, and where new research questions need to be asked and answered. |
| Subjects: | | (un)bounded rationality (non-)cooperative game theory bargaining and negotiation (theory and experiments) |
| JEL: | | C90 C92 C93 D63 D64 D71 D74 |
| Document Type: | | Working Paper |
| Appears in Collections: | | Jena Economic Research Papers, MPI für Ökonomik
|
| Files in This Item:
| |
|
| No. of Downloads:
| |
| last Month |
last 3 Month |
total |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | |
Download bibliographical data as:
BibTeX
|
| |
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56910
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|