EconStor >
Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Jena >
Jena Economic Research Papers (2007-2014), Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik und Universität Jena >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKataria, Miteshen_US
dc.description.abstractThe Porter hypothesis suggests that environmental regulations, such as restricting firms to reduce pollution, stimulates innovations and create a win-win situation for the environment and for firms. It has received a great deal of attention from academics as well as bureaucrats who disagree about the applicability of the Porter hypothesis. This study tests if part of such disagreement can be explained by a preference-expectation relationship and if people more likely to believe in a scientific hypothesis that appeals to their preferences. The results show that individuals' who care more about the environment are more likely to believe in the Porter hypothesis. Males are also found to believe more in the Porter hypothesis while females are more uncertain. Education is found to be insignificant in explaining beliefs about the Porter hypothesis. Based on our results we also discuss if and how scientific and economic methodology can mitigate a preference-expectation bias.en_US
dc.publisherUniv. [u.a.] Jenaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJena economic research papers 2010,088en_US
dc.subject.keywordporter hypothesisen_US
dc.subject.keywordsubjective beliefsen_US
dc.subject.keywordeconomic methodologyen_US
dc.subject.stwWissenschaftliche Methodeen_US
dc.titleThe role of preferences in disagreements over scientific hypothesis: An empirical inquiry into environmental and economic decision makingen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Jena Economic Research Papers (2007-2014), Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik und Universität Jena

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
642187282.pdf556.99 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.