|
EconStor >
Stockholm School of Economics >
EFI - The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics >
SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, EFI - The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56326
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Bianchi, Milo | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Henrekson, Magnus | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2012-03-28T13:10:21Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2012-03-28T13:10:21Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2005 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56326 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | We review and evaluate some recent contributions on the modeling of entrepreneurship within a neoclassical framework, analyzing how and to what extent the fundamental ingredients suggested in the social science literature were captured. We show how these approaches are important in stressing the main elements of a complex picture without being able to completely describe it. However, each modeling attempt focuses only on one specific feature of entrepreneurship. The entrepreneurial function broadly perceived eludes analytical tractability. As a consequence, the models can be useful in analyzing the effect of entrepreneurial behavior at an aggregate level, but not at explaining individual choices. From these observations we highlight how a simplistic interpretation of the existing mainstream approaches incorporating entrepreneurship runs the risk of leading to distortionary policy interventions. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | Ekonomiska Forskningsinst. Stockholm | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 584 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | B41 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | D81 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | J23 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | L23 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | M13 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | O31 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Entrepreneurial Choice | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Entrepreneurship | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Innovation | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Neoclassical Modeling | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Uncertainty | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Entrepreneurship-Ansatz | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Neoklassik | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Theorie | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Is neoclassical economics still entrepreneurless? | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 47907044X | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | | SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, EFI - The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|