Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56148
Authors: 
Flodén, Martin
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 623
Abstract: 
The Ramsey optimal taxation theory implies that the tax rate on capital income should be zero in the long run. This result holds even if the social planner only cares about workers that do not hold assets, or if the planner only cares about any other group in the economy. This paper demonstrates that although all households agree that capital income taxation should be eliminated in the long run, they do not agree on how to eliminate these taxes. Wealthy households would prefer a reform that is funded mostly by higher taxes on labor income while households with little wealth would prefer a reform that is funded mostly by high taxes on initial wealth. Pareto improving reforms typically exist, but the welfare gains of such reforms are modest.
Subjects: 
optimal taxation
inequality
redistribution
JEL: 
E60
H21
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
215.37 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.