EconStor >
Stockholm School of Economics >
EFI - The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics >
SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, EFI - The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56110
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOno, Hiroshien_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-29en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-28T13:03:37Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-28T13:03:37Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/56110-
dc.description.abstractGender inequality in educational attainment remains a salient feature of contemporary Japanese society. This inequality lies not at the high school level but at the university level. Equal numbers of men and women advance to high school, but a significantly lower proportion of women advance to four-year universities relative to men. Starting from government statistics which report that Japanese parents aspire to university education more for their sons than for their daughters, I argue that the gender gap in the university advancement rate in Japan stems in part from differences in how parents allocate resources within the household depending on the gender of their children. From the individuals' perspective, the gender composition of their siblings should therefore alter the ways in which resources are allocated to them. Using a 1995 cross-sectional sample of men and women between the ages of 20 and 70 in Japan, I test the null hypothesis that the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) between an additional brother versus an additional sister with respect to the probability that an individual advances to university or not is equal to unity, i.e. MRS = 1 implies that brothers and sisters are perfectly substitutable and that parents allocate resources equally amongst their sons and daughters. My results show that the null hypothesis is rejected for women but cannot be rejected for men: It is not sibship size per se that depresses women's likelihood of university advancement, but the number of brothers in the household. My findings lend support to the position that intra-household resources in Japan are likely to be allocated in favor of sons and away from daughters.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEkonomiska Forskningsinst. Stockholmen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 397en_US
dc.subject.jelD10en_US
dc.subject.jelJ13en_US
dc.subject.jelJ16en_US
dc.subject.jelJ24en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordhuman capital formationen_US
dc.subject.keywordeconomics of the familyen_US
dc.subject.keywordquality-quantity tradeoff of childrenen_US
dc.subject.keywordgender inequalityen_US
dc.titleAre sons and daughters substitutable? A study of intra-household allocation of resources in contemporary Japanen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn687681138en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, EFI - The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
687681138.pdf216 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.