EconStor >
Universität Bremen >
Zentrum für Sozialpolitik (ZeS), Universität Bremen >
ZeS-Arbeitspapiere, Universität Bremen >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title:Religion and the gender vote gap: Women's changed political preferences from the 1970s to 2010 PDF Logo
Authors:Manow, Philip
Emmenegger, Patrick
Issue Date:2012
Series/Report no.:ZeS-Arbeitspapier 01/2012
Abstract:For many years women tended to vote more conservative than men (the 'old' gender vote gap), but since the 1980s this gap in many countries has shifted direction: now women in many countries are more likely to support left parties than men of the same age, in the same income bracket, and at the same educational level (the 'new' gender vote gap). The literature largely agrees on a set of political-economic factors explaining the change in women's political orientation: changed employment patterns, women's higher educational achievements, and higher divorce rates. These trends turned women into supporters of generous social programs that promise to 'de-familialize' services formerly provided privately within the family. In this paper, we demonstrate that these conventional political-economic factors fall short in explaining the old gender vote gap. We may therefore also harbor doubts whether they provide us with a full story for the new gender vote gap. Instead, we highlight the importance of religion for the gendered pattern of voting behavior that we observe. We argue that where vote choice expressed preferences on a non-economic, i.e. mainly religious issue dimension, parties in the past could afford - at least to some extent - ignoring voters' socio-economic interests. Given that surveys show us a constantly higher degree of religiosity among women and a relatively persistent and strong impact of religion on vote choice, religion can indeed, we argue, explain a substantial part of the old and new gender vote gap.
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:ZeS-Arbeitspapiere, Universität Bremen

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
687053021.pdf2.07 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.