Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55632
Authors: 
Williams, Tyler
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
Working paper series // Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 07-14
Abstract: 
Numerous studies have found that top-down processes can affect perceptions. This study examines some of the issues involved in designing field experiments aimed at discovering whether top-down mental processes affect perceptions, and, if so, how the influence takes place. Lee, Frederick, and Ariely (2006) (LFA) attempt to go further by testing whether expectations affect perception directly, by altering how sensory receptors and/or the brain's processing centers interpret a outside stimulusor indirectly, for example, by changing the amount of attention paid to the outside stimulus. In order to test the robustness of the findings in LFA, this paper reports the results of a field experiment similar to the one analyzed in LFA. The field experiment, designed to address some potential confounding factors in this type of research, confirms that expectations can alter perceptions. However, it also shows that heterogeneity across individuals can play a role in determining the nature of this effect, a finding that complicates the interpretation of results such as those in LFA. To frame the analysis, this paper discusses the difficulties in designing this type of experiment, makes some improvements to existing designs, and suggests some ways of eliminating the confounding influences that remain.
JEL: 
D43
L13
L93
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
264.37 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.