Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55606
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRotemberg, Julio J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-25en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-23T08:23:41Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-23T08:23:41Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/55606-
dc.description.abstractI suppose that people react with anger when others show themselves not to be minimally altruistic. With heterogeneous agents, this can account for the experimental results of ultimatum and dictator games. Moreover, it can account for the surprisingly large fraction of individuals who offer an even split, with parameter values that are more plausible than those required to explain outcomes in these experiments with the models of Levine (1998), Fehr and Schmidt (1999), Dickinson (2000), and Bolton and Ockenfels (2000).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aFederal Reserve Bank of Boston |cBoston, MAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking paper series // Federal Reserve Bank of Boston |x06-12en_US
dc.subject.jelD64en_US
dc.subject.jelD63en_US
dc.subject.jelC72en_US
dc.subject.jelA13en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleMinimally acceptable altruism and the ultimatum gameen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn514906103en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
313.03 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.