|
EconStor >
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston >
Working Paper Series, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55603
|
| | |
| Title: | | Large stakes and big mistakes  |
| Authors: | | Ariely, Dan Gneezy, Uri Loewenstein, George Mazar, Nina |
| Issue Date: | | 2005 |
| Series/Report no.: | | Working paper series // Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 05-11 |
| Abstract: | | Most upper-management and sales force personnel, as well as workers in many other jobs, are paid based on performance, which is widely perceived as motivating effort and enhancing productivity relative to non-contingent pay schemes. However, psychological research suggests that excessive rewards can in some cases produce supra-optimal motivation, resulting in a decline in performance. To test whether very high monetary rewards can decrease performance, we conducted a set of experiments at MIT, the University of Chicago, and rural India. Subjects in our experiment worked on different tasks and received performance-contingent payments that varied in amount from small to large relative to their typical levels of pay. With some important exceptions, we observed that high reward levels can have detrimental effects on performance. |
| Subjects: | | performance-based incentives |
| JEL: | | D00 |
| Document Type: | | Working Paper |
| Appears in Collections: | | Working Paper Series, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
|
| |
| | |
Download bibliographical data as:
BibTeX
|
| |
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55603
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|