EconStor >
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt a. M. >
CPQF Working Paper Series, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55526
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScholz, Peteren_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-17en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-20T12:48:10Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-20T12:48:10Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/55526-
dc.description.abstractThe application of a technical trading rule, which just provides long and short signals, requires the investor to decide upon the exposure to stake in each trade. Although this position sizing (or money management) crucially affects the risk and return characteristics, recent academic literature has largely ignored this effect, leaving reported results incomparable. This work systematically analyzes the impact of position sizing on timing strategies and clarifies the relation to the Kelly criterion, which proposes to bet relative fractions from the remaining gambling budget. Both erratic as well as different relative positions, i.e. fixed proportions of the remaining portfolio value, are compared for simple moving average trading rules. The simulation of parametrized return series allows systematically varying those asset price properties, which are most in uential on timing results: drift, volatility, and autocorrelation. The study reveals that the introduction of relative position sizing has a severe impact on trading results compared to erratic positions. In contrast to a standard Kelly framework, however, an optimal position size does not exist. Interestingly, smaller trading fractions deliver the highest risk-adjusted returns in most scenarios.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrankfurt School of Finance & Management Frankfurt/M.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCPQF Working Paper Series 31en_US
dc.subject.jelG11en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordKelly criterionen_US
dc.subject.keywordmoney managementen_US
dc.subject.keywordparameterized simulationen_US
dc.subject.keywordposition sizingen_US
dc.subject.keywordtechnical analysisen_US
dc.subject.keywordtechnical tradingen_US
dc.subject.keywordtiming strategyen_US
dc.subject.stwPortfolio-Managementen_US
dc.subject.stwWertpapierhandelen_US
dc.subject.stwWertpapieranalyseen_US
dc.subject.stwZeiten_US
dc.subject.stwStrategieen_US
dc.titleSize matters! How position sizing determines risk and return of technical timing strategiesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn685609758en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:cpqfwp:31-
Appears in Collections:CPQF Working Paper Series, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
685609758.pdf1.98 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.