EconStor >
Technische Universität Braunschweig >
Institut für Finanzwirtschaft, Technische Universität Braunschweig >
Working Paper Series, Institut für Finanzwirtschaft, TU Braunschweig >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55228
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Franziskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGürtler, Marcen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-08en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-10T15:38:27Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-10T15:38:27Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/55228-
dc.description.abstractThe estimation of expected security returns is one of the major tasks for the practical implementation of the Markowitz portfolio optimization. Against this background, in 1992 Black and Litterman developed an approach based on (theoretically established) expected equili-brium returns which accounts for subjective investors' views as well. In contrast to historical estimated returns, which lead to extreme asset weights within the Markowitz optimization, the Black-Litterman model generally results in balanced portfolio weights. However, the existence of investors' views is crucial for the Black-Litterman model and with absent views no active portfolio management is possible. Moreover, problems with the implementation of the model arise, as analysts' forecasts are typically not available in the way they are needed for the Black-Litterman-approach. In this context we present how analysts' dividend forecasts can be used to determine an a-priori-estimation of the expected returns and how they can be integrated into the Black-Litterman model. For this purpose, confidences of the investors' views are determined from the number of analysts' forecasts as well as from a Monte-Carlo simulation. After introducing our two methods of view generation, we examine the effects of the Black-Litterman approach on portfolio weights in an empirical study. Finally, the perfor-mance of the Black-Litterman model is compared to alternative portfolio allocation strategies in an out-of-sample study.en_US
dc.language.isogeren_US
dc.publisherInstitut für Finanzwirtschaft, Technische Universität Braunschweig Braunschweigen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking papers // Institut für Finanzwirtschaft, Technische Universität Braunschweig IF27V2en_US
dc.subject.jelG11en_US
dc.subject.jelG12en_US
dc.subject.jelG14en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordanalysts' earnings forecastsen_US
dc.subject.keyworddiscount rate effecten_US
dc.subject.keywordequity premium puzzleen_US
dc.subject.keywordimplied rate of returnen_US
dc.titleQuantitative forecast model for the application of the Black-Litterman approachen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn68492157Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:tbsifw:IF27V2-
Appears in Collections:Working Paper Series, Institut für Finanzwirtschaft, TU Braunschweig

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
68492157X.pdf251.97 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.