EconStor >
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt a. M. >
Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55214
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLöchel, Horsten_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Helena Xiangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-08en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-10T10:26:32Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-10T10:26:32Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/55214-
dc.description.abstractThe big Chinese state-owned banks came as winners out of the global financial crisis. According to the Banker ranking, Chinese banks led the global banking profitability ranking through the years from 2008 to 2010 and contributed one fifth of global banking profits in 2010. The Chinese banking sector, which was deemed as wholly insolvent ten years ago, was reborn like a phoenix from the fire of the Asian financial crisis and the current financial crisis. The banking reform in the last decade with large-scale capital injection, assets carve-outs, restructuring and public listing celebrated great success. However, the low efficiency in Chinese banks is still persistent, as evident in many empirical studies (e.g. Feyzioglu, (2009)). The contradiction of high profitability and low efficiency causes great confusion in understanding banking in China. Our paper aims to reveal the real sources of the high profitability of the big Chinese banks. We compare their profitability pattern with peer banks from Asia, Europe and North America. We first test the hypothesis that the average asset return of the big five Chinese banks will fall below the international comparative level if the current high net interest margin given by the managed interest system in China falls to the international peer average level. Surprisingly, the hypothesis has to be rejected. Instead, our results show that the profitability of Chinese banks stays at international comparative level, despite the high inefficiency in Chinese banks. We therefore test a second hypothesis stating that the profitability of Chinese banks will fallbelow their international peers if staff costs increase by 30 percent in average to reach the international level, with the joint condition of margin decrease. This hypothesis can be proved, which means that the big five Chinese banks compensate its inefficiency by a combination of a non-competitive high interest margin and unsustainable lower labor cost. The above results of course raise the question how the big Chinese banks can stay competitive if China continues to liberalize its interest rate system and labor cost increases. In our concluding remarks, we discuss the possibility that Chinese banks change their business model towards universal banking with additional non-interest income to compensate the drop in interest margin.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrankfurt School of Finance & Management Frankfurt, M.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper series // Frankfurt School of Finance & Management 177en_US
dc.subject.jelG01en_US
dc.subject.jelG20en_US
dc.subject.jelG21en_US
dc.subject.jelG28en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordChinaen_US
dc.subject.keywordbanksen_US
dc.subject.keywordfinanceen_US
dc.subject.keywordbanking business modelen_US
dc.subject.keyworduniversal bankingen_US
dc.subject.stwBanken_US
dc.subject.stwÖffentliche Banken_US
dc.subject.stwRentabilitäten_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftliche Effizienzen_US
dc.subject.stwZinsspannenrechnungen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitskostenen_US
dc.subject.stwUniversalbanken_US
dc.subject.stwGeschäftsmodellen_US
dc.subject.stwChinaen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the high profitability of Chinese banksen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn684912104en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:fsfmwp:177-
Appears in Collections:Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
684912104.pdf288.33 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.