Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/55194 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQin, Duoen
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-04-
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-09T14:07:21Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-09T14:07:21Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/55194-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the evolution of econometric research in business cycle analysis during the 1960-90 period. It shows how the research was dominated by an assimilation of the tradition of NBER business cycle analysis by the Haavelmo-Cowles Commission approach, catalysed by time-series statistical methods. Methodological consequences of the assimilation are critically evaluated in light of the meagre achievement of the research in predicting the current global recession.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aQueen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance |cLondonen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking Paper |x669en
dc.subject.jelB23en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordbusiness cyclesen
dc.subject.keywordNBERen
dc.subject.keywordforecastingen
dc.subject.stwKonjunkturtheorieen
dc.subject.stwPrognoseverfahrenen
dc.subject.stwWissenschaftliche Methodeen
dc.subject.stwÖkonometrieen
dc.subject.stwIndustriestaatenen
dc.titleEconometric studies of business cycles in the history of econometrics-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn632232854en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
164.82 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.