Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/54945 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Economics Discussion Papers No. 2012-4
Publisher: 
Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel
Abstract: 
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, all else being equal, for the case of Italy, tourist areas tend to have a greater amount of crime than non-tourist areas in the long run. Following the literature of the economics of crime à la Becker (1968) and Ehrlich (1973) and using a system GMM approach for the time span 1985-2003, the authors empirically test whether total crime in Italy is affected by tourist arrivals. Findings confirm the initial intuition of a positive relationship between tourism and crime in destinations. When controlling for the difference between tourists and residents in the propensity to be victimized, no relevant differences are found: the likelihood to be victimized is quite similar for the two groups. As a consequence, agglomeration and urbanisation effects seem to be the main explanation for the impact of tourism on crime. One can image that overcrowded cities provide more opportunities to criminals to commit illegal activities regardless of the number of visitors and residents in destinations.
Subjects: 
Tourism
crime
externalities
JEL: 
D62
K00
L83
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc Logo
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
446.96 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.