EconStor >
International Black Sea University, Tbilisi >
IBSU Scientific Journal (IBSUSJ) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/54652
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLimberea, Cicero I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-22en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-11T17:01:07Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-11T17:01:07Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationIBSU Scientific Journal (IBSUSJ) 1512-3731 5 2011 1 45-56en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/54652-
dc.description.abstractBy analyzing the pros and cons of the US farms taxation methodologies, this paper aims to suggest that best practice of taxing farms in transition economies would be consistent with a multiple of cash flow valuation approach and suggests that a liquid market for agricultural insurance can be created in emerging economies as it provides a methodology for valuation of drought insurance contracts. As such recent drought and flood damages in such countries could have been reimbursed privately and thus the recent rise of food prices internationally may have been prevented.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Black Sea University Tbilisien_US
dc.subject.jelH21en_US
dc.subject.jelQ12en_US
dc.subject.jelQ14en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordevaluationen_US
dc.subject.keywordtaxingen_US
dc.subject.keywordinsuranceen_US
dc.subject.keywordagricultureen_US
dc.subject.keywordUS farmsen_US
dc.titleEvaluating, taxing and insuring agricultural enterprisesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ppn668682388en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:IBSU Scientific Journal (IBSUSJ)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
668682388.pdf197.64 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.