EconStor >
United Nations University (UNU) >
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University >
WIDER Working Papers, United Nations University (UNU) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/54134
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgbor, Julius A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T13:19:18Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T13:19:18Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-92-9230-390-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/54134-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates some of the existing hypotheses regarding the transmission of different colonial legacies to modern day economic growth. The fact that different colonial strategies were pursued by different colonizers in various territories suggests possible ramifications for current development paths. This paper attempts to understand why economic growth performance is different even among African countries, where former British colonies appear to do marginally better. It focuses on two key channels of transmission, namely education and trade. Thirty-six Sub-Saharan African countries during the period 1960 - 2000 are considered using Hausman-Taylor estimation techniquein an annualized panel data framework. In contrast with the methodology of previous studieswhere only the initial conditions at independence were held to influence the post-colonialgrowth path, this study attempts to distinguish the direct influences of colonization from the indirect influences by combining both the initial conditions at independence alongside the subsequent post-independence changes in explaining growth differences amongst former Sub-Saharan African colonies.The results suggest that the indirect influences of colonial educational policies matter more for post-colonial growth than the direct influences.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWIDER Helsinkien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper // World Institute for Development Economics Research 2011,27en_US
dc.subject.jelF54en_US
dc.subject.jelO47en_US
dc.subject.jelI20en_US
dc.subject.jelN17en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordcolonial originen_US
dc.subject.keywordeducationen_US
dc.subject.keywordinstitutionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordHausman-Tayloren_US
dc.subject.keywordSub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.subject.stwKolonialismusen_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftswachstumen_US
dc.subject.stwAfrika südlich der Saharaen_US
dc.titleHow does colonial origin matter for economic performance in sub-Saharan Africa?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn657453218en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:WIDER Working Papers, United Nations University (UNU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
657453218.pdf184.26 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.