EconStor >
United Nations University (UNU) >
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University >
WIDER Working Papers, United Nations University (UNU) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/54045
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLandau, Loren B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-13en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T13:16:49Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T13:16:49Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-92-9230-286-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/54045-
dc.description.abstractAccepting that successful 'development' is premised on a population's participation in a collective undertaking, we must understand urban residents'; interactions and ambitions. In African cities being transformed by geographic and social mobility, it is unclear what forms of inclusion, solidarity or mutual recognition are desired or possible among those who live there. This paper argues that the pursuit of three objectives - profit, protection and passage - shaping these cities' social formations in ways that limit the ability of official and non-official institutions to interweave popular aspirations - however temporarily - to promote a common and mutually beneficial future. The paper starts from the premise that the novelty of the emerging social forms within Africa's cities requires a willingness to induce: to build a conceptual vocabulary of belonging reflecting practices of those living in and moving through Africa's cities. Only after doing this will we have the building blocks for further debate. With this in mind, the paper works towards a pair of interrelated tasks. The first is to challenge three premises often informing discussions of mobility and urban politics: (i) the presence of a dominant host community or political order; (ii) that cities are destinations and not points of transit; and (iii) that state institutions are the primary source of exclusion and the most potent tool for fostering inclusion in a collective endeavour. Second, it considers one form of membership and inclusion that can emerge where the presumptions outlined above do not hold. In doing so, it points to a kind of 'tactical cosmopolitanism' a set of discourses and practices that can subvert ethnic or national chauvinism and restrictive migration or anti-urbanization policies and practices. Drawing primarily on examples from Johannesburg, it shows how migrants negotiate partial inclusion in transforming societies without becoming bounded by them. The paper ends by reflecting briefly on the challenges such tactics pose for generating a collective urban project.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWIDER Helsinkien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper // World Institute for Development Economics Research 2010,49en_US
dc.subject.jelR0en_US
dc.subject.jelR58en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordmigrationen_US
dc.subject.keywordurbanizationen_US
dc.subject.keywordAfrican citiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsocial cohesionen_US
dc.subject.keywordintegrationen_US
dc.subject.keywordcosmopolitanismen_US
dc.titlePassage, profit, protection and the challenge of participationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn636592952en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:WIDER Working Papers, United Nations University (UNU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
636592952.pdf85.26 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.