EconStor >
United Nations University (UNU) >
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University >
WIDER Working Papers, United Nations University (UNU) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/54019
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKundu, Amitabhen_US
dc.contributor.authorKundu, Debolinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-13en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T13:16:14Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T13:16:14Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-92-9230-308-2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/54019-
dc.description.abstractThis paper overviews the debate on the relationship between the measures of globalization, economic growth and pace of urbanization, and speculates on its impact on the quality of life and poverty in the context of Asian countries. After experiencing moderate to high urban growth for three to four decades since the 1950s, most of these countries have reported a significant deceleration. This questions the postulate of the epicentre of urbanization shifting to Asia. It also lends credence to the thesis of exclusionary urban growth, which is linked with the formal or informal denial of entry to poor migrants and increased unaffordability of urban space of the rural people. An analysis of the policies and programmes at the national and regional levels shows that these have contributed to the ushering in of this era of urban exclusion. The process of elite capture in the global cities has led to 'sanitization' and cleaning up of the micro environment by pushing out the current and prospective migrants and informal activities out of the city boundaries. Given the political economy of urban growth and the need to attract global and domestic capital into cities, governments would not interfere with 'elitist interests'. Asia, thus, is unlikely to go the same way as Latin America did in the second half of the last century. To absorb incremental labourforce outside agriculture, many of the large countries may, however, promote the small and medium towns that have unfortunately reported economic stagnation and deceleration in population growth. Furthermore, a few among the small and less developed countries are likely to experience high urban growth, largely due to foreign investment. This would impact on the geopolitical balance on the continent despite the fact that expansion in the urban and industrial base in these countries would not make a dent on macro-level aggregates.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWIDER Helsinkien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper // World Institute for Development Economics Research 2010,70en_US
dc.subject.jelF5en_US
dc.subject.jelR1en_US
dc.subject.jelI0en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordWater supplyen_US
dc.subject.keywordperceptionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordenvironmental healthen_US
dc.subject.keywordtransitionen_US
dc.subject.keywordurbanizationen_US
dc.titleGlobalization and exclusionary urban growth in Asian countriesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn63662028Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:WIDER Working Papers, United Nations University (UNU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
63662028X.pdf108.92 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.