EconStor >
Bank of Canada, Ottawa >
Bank of Canada Working Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53879
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBolder, David Jamiesonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRomanyuk, Yuliyaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T12:57:34Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T12:57:34Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53879-
dc.description.abstractModel risk is a constant danger for financial economists using interest-rate forecasts for the purposes of monetary policy analysis, portfolio allocations, or risk-management decisions. Use of multiple models does not necessarily solve the problem as it greatly increases the work required and still leaves the question which model forecast should one use?” Simply put, structural shifts or regime changes (not to mention possible model misspecifications) make it difficult for any single model to capture all trends in the data and to dominate all alternative approaches. To address this issue, we examine various techniques for combining or averaging alternative models in the context of forecasting the Canadian term structure of interest rates using both yield and macroeconomic data. Following Bolder and Liu (2007), we study alternative implementations of four empirical term structure models: this includes the Diebold and Li (2003) approach and three associated generalizations. The analysis is performed using more than 400 months of data ranging from January 1973 to July 2007. We examine a number of model-averaging schemes in both frequentist and Bayesian settings, both following the literature in this field (such as de Pooter, Ravazzolo and van Dijk (2007)) in addition to introducing some new combination approaches. The forecasts from individual models and combination schemes are evaluated in a number of ways; preliminary results show that model averaging generally assists in mitigating model risk, and that simple combination schemes tend to outperform their more complex counterparts. Such findings carry significant implications for central-banking analysis: a unified approach towards accounting for model uncertainty can lead to improved forecasts and, consequently, better decisions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBank of Canada Ottawaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBank of Canada Working Paper 2008,34en_US
dc.subject.jelC11en_US
dc.subject.jelE43en_US
dc.subject.jelE47en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordInterest ratesen_US
dc.subject.keywordEconometric and statistical methodsen_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftsprognoseen_US
dc.subject.stwZinsen_US
dc.subject.stwÖkonometrieen_US
dc.subject.stwKanadaen_US
dc.titleCombining Canadian interest-rate forecastsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn584972857en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Bank of Canada Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
584972857.pdf870.87 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.