EconStor >
Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo >
ADBI Working Paper Series, Asian Development Bank Institute >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53758
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKawai, Masahiroen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T12:28:08Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T12:28:08Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53758-
dc.description.abstractIt has taken two crises - the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 and the global financial crisis of 2007-2009 - for the international community to seriously focus on the reform of the international financial architecture for crisis prevention, management and resolution. Facing the global financial crisis, the international community has responded by making the G20 Summit the premier forum for international economic and financial cooperation, creating a potentially more powerful Financial Stability Board, and augmenting the financial resources of the IMF. However, the international financial architecture remains inadequate for the needs of many emerging market economies. The effectiveness of IMF surveillance - particularly that of systemically important economies (such as the US, the UK and the Euro Area) - as well as its governance structure should be improved. International liquidity support should be made available when any country with sound economic and financial management is put into an externally driven crisis. International agreements should be reached on external (sovereign) debt restructuring, and on the cross-border resolution of insolvent, internationally active financial firms for fair burden sharing of losses between creditors and debtors, or among different national authorities. A well-functioning regional financial architecture could complement and strengthen the international financial architecture. East Asian authorities should focus on: (i) the establishment of resilient national financial systems, including local-currency bond markets; (ii) integration of national financial markets to facilitate the mobilization of regional savings for regional investment (in infrastructure and SMEs); and (iii) enhancement of regional liquidity (Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization) and economic surveillance mechanisms. The region should also intensify regional exchange rate policy coordination to achieve sustained economic growth without creating macroeconomic and financial instability.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAsian Development Bank Institute Tokyoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesADBI working paper series 167en_US
dc.subject.jelF30en_US
dc.subject.jelF32en_US
dc.subject.jelF33en_US
dc.subject.jelF34en_US
dc.subject.jelF53en_US
dc.subject.jelF55en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwFinanzmarktkriseen_US
dc.subject.stwInternationaler Finanzmarkten_US
dc.subject.stwKapitalmobilitäten_US
dc.subject.stwInternationales Währungssystemen_US
dc.subject.stwRegulierungen_US
dc.subject.stwAufsichtsbehördeen_US
dc.subject.stwInternationale Wirtschaftsorganisationen_US
dc.subject.stwAsienen_US
dc.subject.stwWelten_US
dc.titleReform of the international financial architecture: An Asian perspectiveen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn613710843en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:ADBI Working Paper Series, Asian Development Bank Institute

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
613710843.pdf255.92 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.