Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53593
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdhikari, Bhimen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-03en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T12:25:35Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T12:25:35Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53593-
dc.description.abstractMarket-based approaches to environmental management, such as payment for environmental services (PES), have attracted unprecedented attention during the past decade. PES policies, in particular, have emerged to realign private and social benefits such as internalizing ecological externalities and diversifying sources of conservation funding as well as making conservation an attractive land-use paradigm. In this paper, we review several case studies from Asia on payment for environmental services to understand how landowners decide to participate in PES schemes. The analysis demonstrates the significance of four major elements facilitating the adoption and implementation of PES schemes: property rights and tenure security, transaction costs, household and community characteristics, communications, and the availability of PES-related information. PES schemes should target win-win options through intervention in these areas, aimed at maintaining the provision of ecological services and improving the conditions for local inhabitants.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aAsian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) |cTokyoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aADBI working paper series |x134en_US
dc.subject.jelQ57en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleMarket-based approaches to environmental management: A review of lessons from payment for environmental services in Asiaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn60464034Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
169.58 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.