EconStor >
Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo >
ADB Institute Discussion Papers, Asian Development Bank Institute >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53542
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSteinherr, Alfreden_US
dc.contributor.authorGirardin, Ericen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T12:22:28Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T12:22:28Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53542-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we report the European experience with a basket currency, the ECU. The ECU was initially introduced as a reference unit and later became the anchor of the European Monetary System. Public policy was complemented by private sector initiatives and use of the ECU for denomination of financial instruments. In practice, it turned out that a basket currency entails considerable unexpected technical complexities. The technical particularities of a basket currency are discussed before we turn to the criteria for determining the shares of participating currencies. We show that there are no iron-clad economic principles and therefore there is some room for political considerations. In Europe three criteria were used for determining the weights: GDP shares, international trade shares, and financial market indicators. In addition, weights will change with exchange rate movements. Appreciating currencies will experience increasing weights and depreciating currencies decreasing weights. This may require a correction mechanism for political acceptability. In Europe, weights were rescaled by political authorities every five years. From an economic viewpoint, weights depend critically on the purpose of the basket currency: is it a reference indicator, is it a currency for international transactions, or is it a parallel currency? Thus, before weights are to be discussed a clear vision of the role of the basket currency would be desirable. The vastly different growth performance among Asian economies also suggests a preference to forward rather than backward-looking measures. Turning then to the different functions of a basket currency, we examine the use of basket currencies as a divergence indicator, or as a financial instrument in regional finanen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAsian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) Tokyoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesADB Institute Discussion Papers 116en_US
dc.subject.jelF33en_US
dc.subject.jelF36en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleRegional monetary units for East Asia: Lessons from Europeen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn59517146Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:ADB Institute Discussion Papers, Asian Development Bank Institute

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
59517146X.pdf274.51 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.