EconStor >
Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo >
ADB Institute Discussion Papers, Asian Development Bank Institute >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53540
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSetboonsarng, Sununtaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T12:22:26Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T12:22:26Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53540-
dc.description.abstractThe growth of ethical consumerism in developed countries has led to increased imports of environmentally and socially certified products produced by the poor in developing countries, which could potentially contribute towards the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Among these, organic products and fair-trade products are among the rapidly growing 'ethical trade' products. This market development trend utilizes certification systems that ensure the impartiality of assessing products produced in developing countries. This paper assesses how the conditions under organic certification and fair-trade certification directly and indirectly contribute to the achievement of the MDG targets. The study finds that organic certification substantially contributes to MDG1 (poverty and hunger) and MDG7 (environmental sustainability). Farmers who follow certification requirements stand to be rewarded with substantial improvements in farming systems, premium prices, and better market access. In addition, by eliminating the risk of exposure to toxic agrochemicals, it directly contributes to health-related MDGs. Moreover, as organic agriculture contributes to mitigating climate change, certified organic farmers with established farm-monitoring systems are in better positions to receive compensation for soil carbon sequestration, when the methodology is approved. However, organic certification doesn't clearly address social aspects, which fair-trade certification directly deals with. Fairtrade certification directly targets smallholders in marginal areas, resulting in broader impacts on other non-income MDGs. In addition, financial benefits for fair-trade certification are immediate, as organic certification often requires a transition period before full certification is granted. Thus, in achieving the MDG targets, a combination of organic and fair-trade certification is recommended. This paper concludes that for this market-based development scheme to broaden its poverty impacts, public sector support in harmonizing standards, building up the capacity of certifiers, developing infrastructure development, and innovating alternative certification systems will be required.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAsian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) Tokyoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesADB Institute Discussion Papers 115en_US
dc.subject.jelQ56en_US
dc.subject.jelF18en_US
dc.subject.jelI39en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwBiokosten_US
dc.subject.stwFairer Handelen_US
dc.subject.stwNormungen_US
dc.subject.stwMillennium Development Goalsen_US
dc.titleCan ethical trade certification contribute to the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals? A review of organic and fair-trade certificationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn576842745en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:ADB Institute Discussion Papers, Asian Development Bank Institute

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
576842745.pdf147.26 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.