Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53300
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTulkens, Henryen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteenberghe, Vincent vanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T11:32:43Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T11:32:43Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53300-
dc.description.abstractThe usually assumed two categories of costs involved in climate change policy analysis, namely abatement and damage costs, hide the presence of a third category, namely adaptation costs. This dodges the determination of an appropriate level for them. Including adaptation costs explicitly in the total environmental cost function allows one to characterize the optimal (cost minimizing) balance between the three categories, in statics as well as in dynamics. Implications are derived for cost benefit analysis of adaptation expenditures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) |cMilanoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aNota di lavoro // Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: Sustainable development |x79.2009en_US
dc.subject.jelQ5en_US
dc.subject.jelH0en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordClimate Changeen_US
dc.subject.keywordMitigationen_US
dc.subject.keywordAdaptationen_US
dc.subject.keywordSufferingen_US
dc.titleMitigation, adaptation, suffering: In search of the right mix in the face of climate changeen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn646022601en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
780.91 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.