EconStor >
United Nations University (UNU) >
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University >
WIDER Discussion Papers, United Nations University (UNU) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52795
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnwar, Tilaten_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-14T09:39:36Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-14T09:39:36Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9291902314en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/52795-
dc.description.abstractThe financing of Pakistan’s substantial current account deficits within the framework of IMF and the World Bank structural adjustment programmes—about 6 per cent of GDP in the early 1990s led to a debt crisis in the late 1990s. IMF considered this level of current account deficit quite feasible in order to allow import liberalization, while the country needed both internal as well as the external adjustment. IMF also frequently demanded devaluation of the rupee against the US dollar to enhance exports. While exports remained stagnant, the devaluation has directly added to the rupee value of foreign debt resulting in a dramatic increase in debt service burden leading to debt crisis, lower economic growth and higher poverty level in 1998. While devaluation was supposed to boost exports and stimulate economic growth, it seems to have had a recessionary impact on the economy by raising the cost of imported intermediate inputs. Thus, devaluation as an instrument for export promotion involves substantial costs while its benefits are uncertain. Pakistan’s external debt as per cent of GNP is now higher than all but the heavily indebted poor countries (HIPCs); its total debt service as per cent of exports is considerably higher than all the countries, including the HIPCs, a reflection of the country’s grave debt crisis. Although Pakistan qualifies for assistance under the enhanced HIPC Initiative as per criterion of NPV of debt to exports, it has to strive to meet other eligibility criteria. This criteria should be revised to broaden the debt relief to countries whose debt problems are much severe than the HIPC countries. Countries like Pakistan with poverty reduction strategies should be entitled to immediate debt relief. For effective debt management, fiscal consolidation, including tax reform to strengthen the fiscal payments capacity, is essential in achieving debt sustainability. Attention should be given to eliminating the dependence on a very narrow production and export base. – debt ; adjustment ; poverty ; liberalizationen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUNU-WIDER Helsinkien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWIDER Discussion Papers // World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER) 2002/53en_US
dc.subject.jelO11en_US
dc.subject.jelF34en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwAuslandsverschuldungen_US
dc.subject.stwAnpassungsprogramm des IWFen_US
dc.subject.stwArmuten_US
dc.subject.stwPakistanen_US
dc.titleUnsustainable debt burden and poverty in Pakistan: A case for enhanced HIPC initiativeen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn350612285en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:WIDER Discussion Papers, United Nations University (UNU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
350612285.pdf105.36 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.