United Nations University (UNU) >
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University >
WIDER Discussion Papers, United Nations University (UNU) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
| || |
|Title:||Can food-for-work programmes reduce vulnerability? |
|Authors:||Barrett, Christopher B.|
Clay, Daniel C.
|Issue Date:||2002 |
|Series/Report no.:||WIDER Discussion Papers // World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER) 2002/24|
|Abstract:||Food-for-work (FFW) programmes have been widely heralded as a means of providing self-targeting transfers coupled with investment in public goods. This paper reviews the changing context that has sparked such interest in FFW, the simple theory that makes it so conceptually appealing, and conceptual problems with that simple theory, all illustrated with empirical examples, primarily from east Africa. We conclude with an attempt at distilling some useful rules of thumb as to when, how and why FFW can serve effectively as short-term insurance, a longer-term rehabilitation and development intervention, or both. – famine ; food aid ; poverty ; public employment programmes ; transfers|
|Document Type:||Working Paper|
|Appears in Collections:||WIDER Discussion Papers, United Nations University (UNU)|
Download bibliographical data as:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.