EconStor >
EconStor Direct >
Working and Discussion Papers / Arbeits- und Diskussionspapiere, EconStor Direct >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52303
  
Title:The fog of fraud: Mitigating fraud by strategic ambiguity PDF Logo
Authors:Lang, Matthias
Wambach, Achim
Issue Date:2011
Series/Report no.:Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2010,24
Abstract:Most insurance companies publish few data on the occurrence and detection of insurance fraud. This stands in contrast to the previous literature on costly state verification, which has shown that it is optimal to commit to an auditing strategy, as the credible announcement of thoroughly auditing claim reports might act as a powerful deterrent. We show that uncertainty about fraud detection can be an effective strategy to deter ambiguity-averse agents from reporting false insurance claims. If, in addition, the auditing costs of the insurers are heterogeneous, it can be optimal not to commit, because committing to a fraud-detection strategy eliminates the ambiguity. Thus, strategic ambiguity can be an equilibrium outcome in the market and competition does not force firms to provide the relevant information. This finding is also relevant in other auditing settings, like tax enforcement.
Subjects:Fraud
Commitment
Ambiguity
Costly State Verification
Audit
JEL:D8
K4
Additional Information:Revised Version October 2011
older Version:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38877
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Working and Discussion Papers / Arbeits- und Diskussionspapiere, EconStor Direct

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2010_24online1.pdf607.28 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52303

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.