EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/51968
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZinovyeva, Nataliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBagues, Manuel F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-22en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-23T11:41:02Z-
dc.date.available2011-11-23T11:41:02Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:101:1-201104133391en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/51968-
dc.description.abstractSeveral countries have recently introduced gender quotas in hiring and promotion committees at universities. This paper studies whether these policies increase the presence of women in top academic positions. The identification strategy exploits the random assignment mechanism in place between 2002 and 2006 in all academic disciplines in Spain to select the members of promotion committees. We find that a larger proportion of female evaluators increases the chances of success of female applicants to full professor positions. The magnitude of the effect is large: each additional woman on a committee composed of seven members increases the number of women promoted to full professor by 14%. Conversely, when committee members decide on promotions to associate professor positions, we do not observe any significant interaction between the gender of evaluators and the gender of candidates. If anything, in this case a larger share of female evaluators is associated with fewer successful female applicants. The evidence is consistent with the existence of ambivalent sexism.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIZA Bonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper series // Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 5537en_US
dc.subject.jelJ71en_US
dc.subject.jelJ45en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordacademic promotionen_US
dc.subject.keywordgender discriminationen_US
dc.subject.keywordrandomized natural experimenten_US
dc.subject.stwHochschullehreren_US
dc.subject.stwErwerbsverlaufen_US
dc.subject.stwGeschlechterdiskriminierungen_US
dc.subject.stwFrauenpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwFeldforschungen_US
dc.subject.stwSpanienen_US
dc.titleDoes gender matter for academic promotion? Evidence from a randomized natural experimenten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn664670768en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
664670768.pdf299.96 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.