Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/51619 
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 5586
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
The literature has pointed to different causes to explain the productivity gap between Europe and United States in the last decades. This paper tests the hypothesis that the lower European productivity performance in comparison with the US can be explained not only by a lower level of corporate R&D investment, but also by a lower capacity to translate R&D investment into productivity gains. The proposed microeconometric estimates are based on a unique longitudinal database covering the period 1990-2008 and comprising 1,809 US and European companies for a total of 16,079 observations. Consistent with previous literature, we find robust evidence of a significant impact of R&D on productivity; however - using different estimation techniques - the R&D coefficients for the US firms always turn out to be significantly higher. To see to what extent these transatlantic differences may be related to the different sectoral structures in the US and the EU, we differentiated the analysis by sectors. The result is that both in manufacturing, services and high-tech sectors US firms are more efficient in translating their R&D investments into productivity increases.
Subjects: 
R&D
productivity
embodied technological change
US
EU
JEL: 
O33
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
338.57 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.