EconStor >
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt a. M. >
Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/51556
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann-Pillath, Carstenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-25en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-21T17:02:47Z-
dc.date.available2011-11-21T17:02:47Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/51556-
dc.language.isogeren_US
dc.publisherFrankfurt School of Finance & Management Frankfurt, M.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper series // Frankfurt School of Finance & Management 176en_US
dc.subject.jelB41en_US
dc.subject.jelB52en_US
dc.subject.jelD02en_US
dc.subject.jelD87en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordneuroeconomicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordinstitutionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordmultiple selvesen_US
dc.subject.keywordidentityen_US
dc.subject.keywordrule followingen_US
dc.subject.keyworddistributed cognitionen_US
dc.subject.keywordimitationen_US
dc.titleNeuroökonomik, Institutionen und verteilte Kognition: Empirische Grundlagen eines nicht-reduktionistischen naturalistischen Forschungsprogramms in den Wirtschaftswissenschaftenen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn670505684en_US
dc.description.abstracttransThis paper presents an overview of recent research in neuroeconomics, in the light of the question how these relate to institutional economics. I present a critique of Glimcher's recent internalist standard model of neuroeconomics and put forward the claim that only an externalist approach can provide a consistent framework for relating neuroscience and economics, which implies a pivotal role for institutions. I discuss the relation between neuroeconomics and institutional economics from three different perspectives. How does neuroeconomics improve our knowledge about the relation between behavior and institutions (rule follwoing)? Can neuroeconomics provide deeper insights into the effects of institutions on behavior? In which way does neuroeconomics change the relation between institutional analysis and welfare analysis? In all these respects, I show that the orginal Hayekian conjectures applies, namely that the analysis of the human brain contributes substantially to our understanding of institutions, and that mental phenomena cannot be isolated from institutional phenomena.-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:fsfmwp:176-
Appears in Collections:Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
670505684.pdf450.55 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.