EconStor >
Leibniz-Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Transformationsökonomien (IAMO), Halle (Saale) >
IAMO Forum 2011: Will the "BRICs Decade" Continue? – Prospects for Trade and Growth >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50790
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTeng, Faxinen_US
dc.contributor.authorKamenev, Dmitryen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeier, Claudiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Martinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-01T12:53:12Z-
dc.date.available2011-11-01T12:53:12Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/50790-
dc.description.abstractChina is widely seen as one of the sources of global macroeconomic imbalances. Its persistent current account surplus and capital exports to the United States are even cited as one of the causes of the global financial crisis. The most common explanation traces China's current acca ount surplus to a mismatch between saving and investment due to inefficiently low domestic demand. We challenge this explanation. Our argument rests on an analogy that we construct between two countries generally thought to be very different: Russia and China. Russia, a raw materials exporting country, has been running current account surpluses similar to China's in relation to GDP. As for most raw materials exporting countries this is considered normal, reflecting efficient reinvestment of wealth from natural resources in financial assets. We show that a similar efficiency argument can be constructed for China, although the nature of wealth that is reinvested in financial assets is different in the two countries. Our analysis implies that China's current account surpluses can be expected to disappear over the long horizon - although the time when this will happen may still be very far away. Moreover, an appreciation of the Chinese currency may not have the desired effect of mitigating the country's current account surplus as a weakening in competitiveness is counterbalanced by a strengthening of investment motives.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLeibniz-Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Mittel- und Osteuropa (IAMO) Halle (Saale)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIAMO Forum 2011 16en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleTrade integration, restructuring and global imbalances: A tale of two countriesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn670793647en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:iamo11:16-
Appears in Collections:IAMO Forum 2011: Will the "BRICs Decade" Continue? – Prospects for Trade and Growth

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
670793647.pdf1.33 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.