EconStor >
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) >
Discussion Papers, Abteilung Regulierung von Arbeit, WZB >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50742
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Hengyien_US
dc.contributor.authorFroud,Julieen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohal, Sukhdeven_US
dc.contributor.authorHaslam, Colinen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Karelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28T14:16:06Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-28T14:16:06Z-
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/50742-
dc.description.abstractThe paper delivers an analysis of the “New Economy” focussing on the roles of new business models, the capital market and venture capital. The capital market created a double standard in the 1990s: A high return on capital was required from old economy firms whereas money was thrown at new economy firms which had a business idea that stimulated the fantasies of financial investors but no earnings. Through the gradual burst of the tech stock bubble since spring 2000 it has come to the eyes of the public that many new economy start ups were unable to recover their costs. This paper shows that business models related to the internet can only work under certain conditions. The sectoral distribution of power, for example, determines the prospects of the single firms to realise e-commerce in a profitable way. Digital technologies do not necessarily enhance profitability. On the contrary, they can increase competition and lead to lower profit rates. The limitation of competition appears to be a central condition of successful cost recovery. The venture capital cycle has been an important driving force of the new economy boom, but it can also be momentum of a longer crisis. Enormous amounts of money have been channeled to new economy start ups hoping that successful IPOs will one day give venture capitalists a high return. But the burst of the bubble has brought down the IPO activity and interrupted the valorisation cycle of venture capital. Financial investors have reacted to the crisis by shifting their capital to even riskier investments, as the come-back of hedge funds indicates.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWZB Berlinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVeröffentlichungsreihe der Abteilung Regulierung von Arbeit des Forschungsschwerpunkts Technik, Arbeit, Umwelt des Wissenschaftszentrums Berlin für Sozialforschung FS II 01-202en_US
dc.subject.ddc300en_US
dc.subject.stwE-Businessen_US
dc.subject.stwUnternehmensgründungen_US
dc.subject.stwRisikokapitalen_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftlichkeiten_US
dc.subject.stwUSAen_US
dc.subject.stwNew Economyen_US
dc.titleA new business model?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn33389605Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:wzbreg:FSII01202-
Appears in Collections:Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des WZB
Discussion Papers, Abteilung Regulierung von Arbeit, WZB

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
33389605X.pdf302.39 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.