EconStor >
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) >
Discussion Papers, Abteilung Sozialstruktur und Sozialberichterstattung, WZB >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50222
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBulmahn, Thomasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-05T13:16:33Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-05T13:16:33Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/50222-
dc.description.abstractThe question asked in this paper is whether modern societies enable the individual to lead a happier life. It was hoped during the Age of the Enlightenment that rationally designed social conditions would lead in the future to greater prosperity, more security and increa- sed happiness for all. Only a little of this optimism has survived into the twentieth centu- ry. In their studies on anomie, sociologists such as Durkheim, Merton and Sennett have drawn attention to the darker sides of progress. Current theories of anomie – explicit social critiques – entirely ignore the successes of modernity and discuss only its crises. In these theories, anomie is described as a structural feature of modern societies, whose destructive consequences are manifested by growing alienation, increasing social isolati- on and rising suicidality. Empirical analyses of data from Germany show, however, that these theses diverge from the reality. Despite rapid processes of modernisation, anomic patterns of perception and behaviour have not become more widespread over the last 20 years; on the contrary, in some areas anomie has decreased significantly. Proceeding from this insight, this article proposes a correction of those models of anomie that are blind to progress. The crises of modernity are confronted with its successes, which have helped considerably to reduce anomic reactions and to stabilise subjective well-being at a high level. Finally, the article points out that this is not a stable equilibrium, rather that temporal and structural imbalances may occur in the course of modernisation processes, whose magnitudes may, however, be curbed – albeit not entirely or in every respect.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWZB Berlinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVeröffentlichungen der Abteilung Sozialstruktur und Sozialberichterstattung des Forschungsschwerpunktes Sozialer Wandel, Institutionen und Vermittlungsprozesse des Wissenschaftszentrums Berlin für Sozialforschung FS III 00-402en_US
dc.subject.ddc300en_US
dc.subject.stwSozialer Wandelen_US
dc.subject.stwSoziale Werteen_US
dc.subject.stwLebensstandarden_US
dc.subject.stwÖffentliche Meinungen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleModernity and happiness: the case of Germanyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn311373321en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:wzbssr:FSIII00402-
Appears in Collections:Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des WZB
Discussion Papers, Abteilung Sozialstruktur und Sozialberichterstattung, WZB

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
311373321.pdf164.57 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.