|
EconStor >
The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin >
ESRI Working Papers, The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50131
|
| | |
| Title: | | Credit where credit's due: Accounting for co-authorship in citation counts  |
| Authors: | | Tol, Richard S.J. |
| Issue Date: | | 2011 |
| Series/Report no.: | | ESRI working paper 387 |
| Abstract: | | I propose a new method (Pareto weights) to objectively attribute citations to co-authors. Previous methods either profess ignorance about the seniority of co-authors (egalitarian weights) or are based in an ad hoc way on the order of authors (rank weights). Pareto weights are based on the respective citation records of the co-authors. Pareto weights are proportional to the probability of observing the number of citations obtained. Assuming a Pareto distribution, such weights can be computed with a simple, closed-form equation but require a few iterations and data on a scholar, her co-authors, and her co-authors' co-authors. The use of Pareto weights is illustrated with a group of prominent economists. In this case, Pareto weights are very different from rank weights. Pareto weights are more similar to egalitarian weights but can deviate up to a quarter in either direction (for reasons that are intuitive). |
| Subjects: | | citations co-authors Pareto distribution |
| Document Type: | | Working Paper |
| Appears in Collections: | | ESRI Working Papers, The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI)
|
| |
| | |
Download bibliographical data as:
BibTeX
|
| |
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50131
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|