Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49903
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuffee, Gregory R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-28en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-27T15:21:32Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-27T15:21:32Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/49903-
dc.description.abstractNo-arbitrage term structure models impose cross-sectional restrictions among yields and can be used to impose dynamic restrictions on risk compensation. This paper evaluates the importance of these restrictions when using the term structure to forecast future bond yields. It concludes that no cross-sectional restrictions are helpful, because cross-sectional properties of yields are easy to infer with high precision. Dynamic restrictions are useful, but can be imposed without relying on the no-arbitrage structure. In practice, the most important dynamic restriction is that the first principal component of Treasury yields follows a random walk. A simple model built around this assumption produces out-of-sample forecasts that are more accurate than those of a variety of alternative dynamic models.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aJohns Hopkins Univ., Dep. of Economics |cBaltimore, Md.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking papers // the Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics |x576en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleForecasting with the term structure: The role of no-arbitrage restrictionsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn644824476en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
230.99 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.