EconStor >
Scienpress Ltd, London >
Advances in Management & Applied Economics >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49025
  
Title:Behavioral biases in economic and financial knowledge: Are they the same for men and women? PDF Logo
Authors:Kudryavtsev, Andrey
Cohen, Gil
Issue Date:2011
Citation:[Journal:] Advances in Management & Applied Economics [ISSN:] 1792-7552 [Volume:] 1 [Year:] 2011 [Issue:] 1 [Pages:] 15-52
Abstract:Contemporary research documents various psychological aspects of economic thought and decision-making. The main goal of our study is to analyze the role of the hindsight bias (Fischhoff [20]) and the anchoring bias (Tversky and Kahneman [53]) in perceiving economic and financial information, and, in particular, the gender differences in the degree of these biases. Hindsight bias denotes people's tendency to overestimate, in hindsight, how predictable an outcome was in foresight, while anchoring bias refers to people's tendency to form their estimates for different categories, starting from a particular available, and often irrelevant, value and insufficiently adjusting their final judgments from this starting value. We carry out an experiment involving a group of MBA students, asking them to recall a number of recent economic and financial indicators (stock and bond market index returns, rates of inflation, urrency exchange rates, etc.). We for document that significant hindsight and anchoring bias are exhibited, on avera ge, each of our experimental questions and by vast majority of the participants. Furthermore, we document that women are more strongly affected by both behavioral biases. Possible reasons for this difference and potential implications are discussed.
Subjects:anchoring
behavioral economics and finance
experimental economics and finance
hindsight bias
information and knowledge
JEL:D83
D89
G10
Document Type:Article
Appears in Collections:Advances in Management & Applied Economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
665791038.pdf227.07 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49025

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.