EconStor >
University of East Anglia >
The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University of East Anglia >
CSERGE Working Papers: EDM - Environmental Decision Making, University of East Anglia >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48822
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGalvin, Rayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-16en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-17T12:33:09Z-
dc.date.available2011-08-17T12:33:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/48822-
dc.description.abstractSub-national governments are now seen as having an important role to play in climate protection. Initial research in this area sought to identify their initiatives in climate change mitigation and theorize their role in relation to national and international climate protection policies. Because of the wide variations of constitutional arrangements that restrict and enable these bodies, it has been difficult to compare their efforts, particularly across national boundaries. However Bulkeley and Kern offer a conceptual framework of four 'modes of governing' that are common to local authorities, enabling their efforts to be compared more meaningfully. This schema is used in an empirical study of Freiburg´s climate protection program. The schema facilitates identification of the full range of Freiburg´s climate initiatives, but is not designed to account for the inappropriateness and counter-productiveness of some of the city´s key climate policies. It is therefore extended in two ways. First, using Hajer´s 'argumentative discourse' approach, the dominant discourses that drive Freiburg´s climate policies are examined, together with how these are held in place cognitively and institutionally. Secondly, a rationale is offered for examining the 'descriptive elements' of environmental discourse in terms of their correspondence to the way the world is. This approach enables a close critique of these discourses, which provides an explanation as to why Freiburg´s climate protection strategy has led to disappointing results. This model is offered for research on other sub-national bodies' climate programmes, and as a means of helping policymakers adopt a more self-critical approach.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCSEGRE Norwichen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCSERGE working paper EDM 09-09en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordMunicipalitiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordClimate Protectionen_US
dc.subject.keywordDiscourseen_US
dc.subject.keywordFreiburgen_US
dc.subject.stwKlimaveränderungen_US
dc.subject.stwUmweltpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwLuftreinhaltungen_US
dc.subject.stwKohlendioxiden_US
dc.subject.stwKommunalverwaltungen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.subject.stwFreiburg (Breisgau)en_US
dc.titleDeveloping a critical model to evaluate the appropriateness of local body climate protection policies: the case of Freiburgen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn607542969en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:CSERGE Working Papers: EDM - Environmental Decision Making, University of East Anglia

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
607542969.pdf144.78 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.