Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48814
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorse-Jones, Sianen_US
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Ianen_US
dc.contributor.authorKontoleon, Andreasen_US
dc.contributor.authorFerrini, Silviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, Neilen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-16en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-17T12:32:36Z-
dc.date.available2011-08-17T12:32:36Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/48814-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we report the results of an online choice experiment designed to test the theoretical consistency of stated preferences for a complex predominantly non-use good. Our case study concerns the values held by UK residents for the conservation of wildlife in the Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania, part of the Eastern Afromontane biodiversity hotspot. Theoretical consistency is assessed through tests of value sensitivity to the scope of the scheme, ordering effects and (more unusually) the presence of substitutes. Critically, we find that 'substitution effects' may account for apparent insensitivity to scope. We also find some evidence that preferences are invariant to the presentation order. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating information about substitutes into the valuation process since welfare estimates may otherwise be overstated.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aCSEGRE |cNorwichen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCSERGE working paper EDM |x10-02en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordenvironmental valuationen_US
dc.subject.keywordchoice experimenten_US
dc.subject.keywordscope testsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsubstitution effectsen_US
dc.subject.keywordorder effectsen_US
dc.subject.stwOffenbarte Präferenzenen_US
dc.subject.stwWillingness to payen_US
dc.subject.stwSubstitutionseffekten_US
dc.subject.stwUmweltökonomiken_US
dc.subject.stwWildtierschutzen_US
dc.subject.stwTesten_US
dc.subject.stwKamerunen_US
dc.titleTesting the theoretical consistency of stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn621201871en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
327.36 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.