EconStor >
University of East Anglia >
The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University of East Anglia >
CSERGE Working Papers: EDM - Environmental Decision Making, University of East Anglia >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Ianen_US
dc.contributor.authorDupont, Dianeen_US
dc.description.abstractPrevious literature has found that politically conservative individuals express a lower willingness-to-pay (WTP) for environmental goods than left-wing supporters. Using data from three surveys valuing water we investigate the role of context by evaluating whether the means of provision (public or private) matters. While left-wing voters have higher WTP for publically provided public goods, right-wing voters have a higher WTP when a good is privately provided. Our findings have implications for values typically obtained for environmental public goods using survey data from constructed markets since scenarios typically describe improvements as being publically provided.en_US
dc.publisherCSEGRE Norwichen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCSERGE working paper EDM 10-09en_US
dc.subject.keywordStated preferenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordpublic provisionen_US
dc.subject.keywordprivate provisionen_US
dc.subject.keywordpolitical affiliationen_US
dc.subject.stwUmweltverträgliches Produkten_US
dc.subject.stwÖffentlicher Sektoren_US
dc.subject.stwWillingness to payen_US
dc.titlePolitical affiliation and willingness-to-pay for publicly versus privately provided environmental goodsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:CSERGE Working Papers: EDM - Environmental Decision Making, University of East Anglia

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
630850038.pdf186.48 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.