Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48766
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGołębiowski, Grzegorzen_US
dc.contributor.authorWiśniewski, Piotren_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-03en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-17T10:41:52Z-
dc.date.available2011-08-17T10:41:52Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.citation|aContemporary economics |c1897-9254 |v3 |y2009 |h4 |p97-114en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/48766-
dc.description.abstractCorporate longevity is - in essence - determined by a company's intrinsic competitive advantage (sometimes dubbed a moat) as well as exogenous factors: from business doing ease - to broader, macroeconomic and strategic factors. In this study, we have endeavoured to compare the business environments and corporate sectors of two recent entrants into the European Union: Estonia and Poland. Overall, Estonia, thanks to greater resolve in post-communist liberal transition, has consistently ensured a superior corporate governance framework. Surprisingly, it is the macroeconomic and strategic steadiness that led to higher corporate survival in Poland. The global economic crisis of 2007-2009 is expected to further back this claim, as the patterns of macroeconomic growth for both countries are set to widen.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleBusiness environments versus corporate survival in Estonia and Poland in 2001-2009en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ppn65707652Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
211.29 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.