Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/48751
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-Feld | Wert | Sprache |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Macek, Wojciech | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-04 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-08-17T10:41:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-17T10:41:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | |aContemporary Economics|c1897-9254|v4|h4|nVizja Press & IT|lWarsaw|y2010|p267-280 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48751 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents comparison of three most popular project management standards belonging to a wider group of models (for example, PMBOK, Prince 2, CMMI, ISO 10006, BS 6079, IPMA Competence Baseline, European Commission Project Cycle Management Guidelines). The author discusses methods of project management according to PMBoK, Prince 2 and ISO 10006, some chosen criteria and fields of knowledge, such as general regulations of standards, project range management, resources management, and processes connected with risk, systems of project quality management. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aVizja Press & IT |cWarsaw | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.title | Methodologies of project management | - |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 657392448 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
econstor.citation.journaltitle | Contemporary Economics | en |
econstor.citation.issn | 1897-9254 | en |
econstor.citation.volume | 4 | en |
econstor.citation.issue | 4 | en |
econstor.citation.publisher | Vizja Press & IT | en |
econstor.citation.publisherplace | Warsaw | en |
econstor.citation.year | 2010 | en |
econstor.citation.startpage | 267 | en |
econstor.citation.endpage | 280 | en |
Datei(en):
Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.