EconStor >
Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsInstitut (HWWI) >
HWWI Research Papers, Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsInstitut >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48237
  
Title:Lessons from the submission and approval process of energy-efficiency CDM baseline and monitoring methodologies PDF Logo
Authors:Müller-Pelzer, Felicia
Michaelowa, Axel
Issue Date:2005
Series/Report no.:HWWI Research Paper 4-1
Abstract:Energy efficiency is a CDM project type that suffers from high methodology rejection rates. 43 baseline and monitoring methodologies for CDM energy efficiency projects are analyzed with respect to reasons for approval / rejection by the CDM Executive Board. Most methodologies have been rejected because they did not comply with implicit quality standards regarding presentation and conservativeness. Also, tools to select the baseline scenario and to prove additionality were frequently lacking. If the level or the quality of production in the baseline or the project scenario changes, a simple before-after-comparison is not valid. Black box models are not accepted and methodologies should be sufficiently differentiated to account for specific (technical) circumstances. The remaining lifetime of equipment has to be taken into account. Often, elements of small-scale methodologies have been retained in approvals of large-scale methodologies.
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:HWWI Research Papers, Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsInstitut

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
663927129.pdf347.74 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48237

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.