Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/46481
Authors: 
Auerswald, Heike
Konrad, Kai A.
Thum, Marcel
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo working paper: Energy and Climate Economics 3320
Abstract: 
The future consequences of climate change are highly uncertain. Today, the exact size of possible future damages are widely unknown. Governments try to cope with these risks by investing in mitigation and adaptation measures. Mitigation aims at a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions whereas adaptation reduces the follow-up costs of climate change. In contrast to the existing literature, we explicitly model the decision of risk-averse governments on mitigation and adaptation policies. Furthermore we also consider the interaction of the two strategies. Mitigation efforts of a single country trigger crowding out as other countries will reduce their mitigation efforts. We show that, under fairly mild conditions, a unilateral increase in mitigation efforts of a single country can even increase global emissions. In contrast, a unilateral commitment to large adaptation efforts benefits the single country and may reduce the global risk from climate change at the expense of other countries.
Subjects: 
climate change
adaptation
mitigation
risk-taking
JEL: 
Q54
Q58
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
553.55 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.