Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/46039
Authors: 
Millimet, Daniel L.
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion paper series // Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 5140
Abstract: 
Researchers in economics and other disciplines are often interested in the causal effect of a binary treatment on outcomes. Econometric methods used to estimate such effects are divided into one of two strands depending on whether they require the conditional independence assumption (i.e., independence of potential outcomes and treatment assignment conditional on a set of observable covariates). When this assumption holds, researchers now have a wide array of estimation techniques from which to choose. However, very little is known about their performance - both in absolute and relative terms - when measurement error is present. In this study, the performance of several estimators that require the conditional independence assumption, as well as some that do not, are evaluated in a Monte Carlo study. In all cases, the data-generating process is such that conditional independence holds with the 'real' data. However, measurement error is then introduced. Specifically, three types of measurement error are considered: (i) errors in treatment assignment, (ii) errors in the outcome, and (iii) errors in the vector of covariates. Recommendations for researchers are provided.
Subjects: 
treatment effects
propensity score
unconfoundedness
selection on observables
measurement error
JEL: 
C21
C52
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
376.06 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.