EconStor >
Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration >
Discussion Papers, Institute for European Integration, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45859
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCavicchi, Pieroen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-26en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-22T16:17:14Z-
dc.date.available2011-06-22T16:17:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/45859-
dc.description.abstractIntroduced by Article 9 of Regulation 1/2003, commitment decisions represent a tool - alternative to Article 7 infringement decisions - available to the European Commission in order to ensure an effective implementation of the EU antitrust rules. Over the last few years there has been an increased recourse to commitment decisions in antitrust cases. This paper explores the reasons for the apparent success of this new instrument and anticipates the consequences of the recent Alrosa judgment rendered by the European Court of Justice, which limits the judicial review of commitment decisions to the manifest incorrectness of the Commission's assessment. The paper concludes that, in light of the extent of the Commission's discretion as to the adoption of commitment decisions defined by the Court in Alrosa, the observed trend seems likely to continue. In particular, given the generous boundaries set by the Court to the Commission's discretionary power, hopes of avoiding system failures in commitment decisions seem actually to be pinned on the Commission's self-restraint more than on the potential for control by the Luxembourg Courts.en_US
dc.language.isogeren_US
dc.publisherEuropa-Kolleg Hamburgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper // Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration 3/11en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordArticle 9 of Regulation 1/2003en_US
dc.subject.keywordArticle 7 of Regulation 1/2003en_US
dc.subject.keywordcommitment decisionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordinfringement decisionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordCommission's discretionary poweren_US
dc.subject.keywordprinciple of proportionalityen_US
dc.subject.keywordECJ Alrosa judgmenten_US
dc.titleThe European commission's discretion as to the adoption of Article 9 commitment decisions: Lessons from Alrosaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn660701413en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ekhdps:311-
Appears in Collections:Discussion Papers, Institute for European Integration, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
660701413.pdf302.6 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.