EconStor >
Bruegel, Brussels >
Bruegel Policy Contribution >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45535
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDelpla, Jaquesen_US
dc.contributor.authorvon Weizs├Ącker, Jakoben_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-24en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-12T10:12:22Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-12T10:12:22Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/45535-
dc.description.abstractThe Blue Bond proposal, published in May 2010 (Bruegel Policy Brief 2010/03) suggests that sovereign debt in euro-area countries be split into two parts. The first part, the senior Blue tranche of up to 60 percent of GDP, would be pooled among participating countries and jointly and severally guaranteed. The second part, the junior Red tranche, would keep debt in excess of 60 percent of GDP as a purely national responsibility. This paper revisits the proposal, discusses its implications and addresses some of the comments and criticisms received in response to the proposal. This paper was prepared for the European Parliament's Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, session of 21 March 2011 on the interaction between bank and sovereign debt resolution. Copyright remains with the European Parliament at all times.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBruegel Brusselsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBruegel policy contribution 2011/02en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleEurobonds: The blue bond concept and its implicationsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn654792429en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Bruegel Policy Contribution

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
654792429.pdf84.92 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.