Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/45535 
Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDelpla, Jaquesen
dc.contributor.authorvon Weizsäcker, Jakoben
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-24-
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-12T10:12:22Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-12T10:12:22Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/45535-
dc.description.abstractThe Blue Bond proposal, published in May 2010 (Bruegel Policy Brief 2010/03) suggests that sovereign debt in euro-area countries be split into two parts. The first part, the senior Blue tranche of up to 60 percent of GDP, would be pooled among participating countries and jointly and severally guaranteed. The second part, the junior Red tranche, would keep debt in excess of 60 percent of GDP as a purely national responsibility. This paper revisits the proposal, discusses its implications and addresses some of the comments and criticisms received in response to the proposal. This paper was prepared for the European Parliament's Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, session of 21 March 2011 on the interaction between bank and sovereign debt resolution. Copyright remains with the European Parliament at all times.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aBruegel |cBrusselsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aBruegel Policy Contribution |x2011/02en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.titleEurobonds: The blue bond concept and its implications-
dc.typeResearch Reporten
dc.identifier.ppn654792429en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.